Volume 18, Issue 1 (1-2026)
jorar 2026, 18(1): 57-69 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Soltani A, Asgharzadeh A, Omidian A. The Role of Militaries in Natural Disaster Management: A Systematic Review. jorar 2026; 18 (1) :57-69
URL: http://jorar.ir/article-1-1059-en.html
URL: http://jorar.ir/article-1-1059-en.html
Researcher, post-disaster reconstruction and rehabilitation research group, Natural Disasters Research Institute (NDRI)
Abstract: (924 Views)
INTRODUCTION: Large-scale natural disasters, particularly in the first hours and days, place severe pressure on civilian response capacities, and in many countries, militaries act as complementary and enabling actors. This study aimed to systematically examine the roles, capacities, outcomes, and challenges of military involvement in the natural disaster crisis management cycle.
METHODS: This study was conducted as a systematic review by searching scientific databases including ProQuest, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Web of Science, as well as SID, Noormags, and Magiran, from October 1950 to May 2025. Articles were selected based on predefined search strategies and inclusion and exclusion criteria. After screening and quality assessment, 22 eligible articles were included in the final analysis. Data were analyzed using thematic content analysis.
FINDINGS: The review identified 12 empirical and 10 conceptual–policy articles. Most of the evidence focused on the response phase, and only a limited number of studies addressed preparedness and recovery. No role was reported for the risk reduction phase. The most frequently reported military roles included medical and health services, logistics, search and rescue, and evacuation and transport. The key military capabilities identified included logistics, emergency medical capacity, rapid deployment, and airlift.
CONCLUSION: The results indicate that in natural disasters, militaries can play a key but temporary and complementary role in health-based and logistical responses and are mainly involved in the response phase. The effectiveness of this involvement depends on clearly defined roles, strengthened civil–military coordination, doctrine development, and investment in specialized training.
METHODS: This study was conducted as a systematic review by searching scientific databases including ProQuest, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Web of Science, as well as SID, Noormags, and Magiran, from October 1950 to May 2025. Articles were selected based on predefined search strategies and inclusion and exclusion criteria. After screening and quality assessment, 22 eligible articles were included in the final analysis. Data were analyzed using thematic content analysis.
FINDINGS: The review identified 12 empirical and 10 conceptual–policy articles. Most of the evidence focused on the response phase, and only a limited number of studies addressed preparedness and recovery. No role was reported for the risk reduction phase. The most frequently reported military roles included medical and health services, logistics, search and rescue, and evacuation and transport. The key military capabilities identified included logistics, emergency medical capacity, rapid deployment, and airlift.
CONCLUSION: The results indicate that in natural disasters, militaries can play a key but temporary and complementary role in health-based and logistical responses and are mainly involved in the response phase. The effectiveness of this involvement depends on clearly defined roles, strengthened civil–military coordination, doctrine development, and investment in specialized training.
Article Type: Review |
Subject:
Other matters related to crisis, disasters and rescue & relief
References
1. Hamdanieh L, Ahmadi Marzaleh M, Ostadtaghizadeh A, Soltani A. Challenges of emergency medical teams and deploying a field hospital in the aftermath of the Beirut blast: a qualitative study. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022;17:e114. [DOI:10.1017/dmp.2022.19]
2. Rațiu A, Bârsan G, Patesan M, Ioniță D. The role played by the armed forces for protection of the civilian population as part of humanitarian crises management: the Romanian approach. Secur Def Q. 2017;16(3):89-101. [DOI:10.35467/sdq/103186]
3. Zaw TN, Lim S. The military's role in disaster management and response during the 2015 Myanmar floods: a social network approach. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2017;25:1-21. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017 .06.023]
4. Naderi M, Khoshdel AR, Sharififar S, et al. Respond quickly and effectively! Components of the military health surveillance system in natural disasters: a qualitative study. J Educ Health Promot. 2023;12(1):383. [DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1592_22]
5. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. New York: United Nations; 2015. Available from: https://www.undrr.org/publication/sendai-framework-disaster-risk-reduction-2015-2030
6. World Health Organization. National civil-military health collaboration framework for strengthening health emergency preparedness: WHO guidance document. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. Available from: https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/f9d35 ba1-0a8f-4078-9b2e-0948a5e364fc/content
7. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Guidelines on the use of foreign military and civil defence assets in disaster relief: Oslo guidelines. Geneva: United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs; 2007. Available from: https://B2n.ir/bh5912
8. Ramazani R, Yari A, Heydari A, Hanafi-Bojd AA, Soltani A, Rostami S, Ostadtaghizadeh A. War, displacement, and the best location for temporary sheltering: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):2066. [DOI:10.1186/s12889-022-14495-w]
9. Ramazani R, Ostadtaghizadeh A, Yari A, Hanafi-Bojd AA, Soltani A, Rostami SB, Heydari A. Criteria for locating temporary shelters for refugees of conflicts: a systematic review. Iran J Public Health. 2022;51(4):758-769.
10. Council of the European :union:, European Parliament, European Commission. The European consensus on humanitarian aid. Brussels: European Commission Directorate-General for Humanitarian Aid; 2007. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/echo/files/media/ publications/consensus_en.pdf
11. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. UN-CMCoord handbook: United Nations humanitarian civil-military coordination. Geneva: United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs; 2025. Available from: https://www.cimic-coe.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/guide-for-the-military-v2.pdf
12. Dagur CO. Armed forces in disaster management: a perspective on functional aspects of role, training and equipment. New Delhi: Centre for Land Warfare Studies; 2008. Available from: https://archive.claws.co.in/ images/publication_pdf/1233126018Mankeshaw%20Paper%204.pdf
13. Manurung Y, Maarif S, Saragih HJR, Widodo P. Civil-military cooperation in natural disaster management. 2022. [DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.14515.30241]
14. Global Protection Cluster. Civil-military coordination for protection outcomes: report of a global protection cluster round-table. Geneva: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees; 2017. Available from: https://globalprotectioncluster.org/sites/default/files/2022-05/gpc-civil-military_coordination-protection-out comes.pdf
15. Imbriale P. The role of government in humanitarian logistics: a systematic review. J Humanit Logist Supply Chain Manag. 2025. [DOI:10.1108/JHLSCM-12-2023-0123]
16. Joanna Briggs Institute. JBI manual for evidence synthesis. 6th ed. Adelaide: Joanna Briggs Institute; 2024. Available from: https://jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL
17. Joanna Briggs Institute. JBI critical appraisal checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies. Adelaide: University of Adelaide; 2020. Available from: https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools
18. Joanna Briggs Institute. JBI critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research. Adelaide: University of Adelaide; 2020. Available from: https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools
19. Joanna Briggs Institute. JBI critical appraisal checklist for textual evidence: narrative. Adelaide: University of Adelaide; 2020. Available from: https://jbi.global/ critical-appraisal-tools
20. Joanna Briggs Institute. JBI critical appraisal checklist for textual evidence: policy and consensus documents. Adelaide: University of Adelaide; 2020. Available from: https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools
21. Mercogliano M, Spatari G, Noviello C, Di Serafino F, Mormile ME, Granvillano G, et al. Building evidences in public health emergency preparedness (BePHEP project): a systematic review. Int J Equity Health. 2025;24(1):41. [DOI:10.1186/s12939-025-02382-w]
22. Anderson R. Thematic content analysis (TCA): descriptive presentation of qualitative data. Palo Alto (CA): Institute of Transpersonal Psychology; 2007.
23. Novo C, Ponte e Sousa P. Are civil protection forces a better choice than the military? Human security and military forces deployment under new security risks. Relac Int. 2020;(43):111-130. [DOI:10.15366/ relacionesinternacionales2020.43.006]
24. De Mendonça BGSG, Filho ABP, Leiras A. The logistic experience of the Brazilian Navy in humanitarian operations: the cases of earthquakes in Haiti and Chile in 2010. Production. 2019;29. [DOI:10.1590/0103-6513.20170061]
25. Chauhan A, Chopra BK. Deployment of medical relief teams of the Indian Army in the aftermath of the Nepal earthquake: lessons learned. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2017;11(3):394-398. [DOI:10.1017/dmp. 2016.146]
26. Nishiyama Y. Disaster relief activities of the Japan Self-Defense Force following the Great East Japan earthquake. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2014;8(3):194-198. [DOI:10.1017/dmp.2014.46]
27. Mamuji A. Canadian military involvement in humanitarian assistance: progress and prudence in natural disaster response. Can Foreign Policy J. 2012;18(2):208. [DOI:10.1080/11926422.2012.709054]
28. Van Fenema PC. National crisis response networks (NCRN) and military organizations: revisiting the Katrina case. Contrib Confl Manag Peace Econ Dev. 2012;19:109-128. [DOI:10.1108/S1572-8323 (2012)0000019011]
29. Madiwale A, Virk K. Civil-military relations in natural disasters: a case study of the 2010 Pakistan floods. Int Rev Red Cross. 2011;93(884):1085-1105. [DOI:10.1017/S181638311200032X]
30. Thompson WC. Success in Kashmir: a positive trend in civil-military integration during humanitarian assistance operations. Disasters. 2010;34(1):1-15. [DOI:10 .1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01111.x]
31. Tarantino D. Asian tsunami relief: Department of Defense public health response: policy and strategic coordination considerations. Mil Med. 2006;171(10 Suppl):15-18. [DOI:10.7205MILMED.171.1S.15]
32. Abolghasemi H, Poorheidari G, Mehrabi A, Foroutan G. Iranian military forces in the Bam earthquake. Mil Med. 2005;170(10):859-861. [DOI:10.7205/MILMED .170.10.859]
33. Anderson EW. Disaster management and the military. GeoJournal. 1994;34(2):201-205. [DOI:10 .1007/BF00813825]
34. Talavera FN. The role of the Peruvian Armed Forces in the event of natural disasters. Rev Cient Gen Jose Maria Cordova. 2024;22(48):943-961. [DOI:10.21830/ 19006586.1394]
35. Radmehr M, Mirzaei D, Ranjbar G. [The role of military forces in the management of natural disasters: a case study of Japan's military forces in earthquake management (Persian)]. Def Manag Res Q 2022;21(96):189-223.
36. Lugova H, Krishnapillai ADS, Mon AA, Shima WF. Civil-military coordination of public health response to urban disasters in Malaysia. Ukr Zurnal Vijskovoi Med. 2020;1(2):35-38. [DOI:10.46847/ujmm.2020.2(1)-035]
37. Avadi S, Seth R. Positioning Indian military for disaster response: comparative analysis of military involvement pre- and post-adoption of National Disaster Management Framework 2005. Def Stud. 2020;20(2):123-142. [DOI:10.1080/14702436.2020.1745072]
38. Kumar G, Dimri BR. Armed forces and disaster management in India. Econ Aff. 2018;63(3):753-760. [DOI:10.30954/0424-2513.3.2018.22]
39. Hornyacsek J. Why the military forces? The role and capabilities of military forces in protection against disasters. Land Forces Acad Rev. 2018;23(1):5-15. [DOI:10.2478/raft-2018-0001]
40. Baytiyeh H, Naja MK. Can Lebanon survive future earthquake disasters by relying on a military response strategy? Int J Public Adm. 2016;39(11):852-860. [DOI:10.1080/01900692.2015.1043015]
41. Hosseini H, Jeddi M. [The role of military organizations in the management of natural disasters (Persian)]. J Def Policy. 2005;52:9-28.
42. Gaydos JC, Luz GA. Military participation in emergency humanitarian assistance. Disasters. 1994;18(1):48-57. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-7717.1994.tb00284.x]
43. Burgess CL. The armed forces in disaster relief. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 1957;309(1):71-79. [DOI:10.1177/000271625730900110]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
